Formulating
and Communicating Conclusions
Designers Should Help Students Justify Their Solutions Through Argumentation Namsoo Shin & Steven McGee What is argumentation?
Why is argumentation important in scientific inquiry?
How does a designer encourage students’ argumentation skills?
References Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environments: Theory and design. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Computer-supported Collaborative learning, Bloomington, IN. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifcats: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22((8)), 797-817. Brown, J. S., A., C., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Edcational Researcher, 18(32-42). Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 161-131. Cohen, D. H. (1995). Argument is war...and war is hell: philosophy, education, and metaphors for argumentation. Informal Logic, 17(2), 177-188. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1994). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Diehl, C. L. (2000). "Reasoner's Workbench" program supports students' individual and collaborative argumentation. Paper presented at the national association for research in science teaching, New Orleans, LA. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Duschl, R. A., Ellenboger, K., & Erduran, S. (1999, march 28-31). Promoting argumentation in middle school sicence classrooms: A project SEPIA evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the national association for resarch in science teaching, Boston, MA. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Edcational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73. Jimenez-aleizandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the Lesson' or "Doing Science': argument in high school genetics. Science Education. Jimenez-alexandre , M. P., PereiroMunoz , C., & Aznar Cuadrado, V. (2000). Expertise, argumentation and scientific practice: a case study about environmental education in the 11th grade. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, New Orleans, LA. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and Evidence: The Development of Scientific Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155-178. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337. McGinn, M., & Roth, W. M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 14-24. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of research in science teaching, 34(2), 125-143. Roth, W. M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else. The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom cultures. Science Education, 79, 475-502. Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of research in science teaching, 30(2), 127-152. Sanders, J. A., Gass, R. H., Wiseman, R. L., & Bruschke, J. C. (1992). An analysis and ethnic comparison of argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and need for cognition. Communication Reports, 5, 50-56. Sanders, J. A., Wiseman, R. L., & Gass, R. H. (1994). Does Teaching Argumenation Facilitate Critical Thinking? Communication Reports, 7(1), 27-35. Siegel, H. (1995). Why should educators care about argumentation? Informal Logic, 17, 159–176. Strike, A. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. J. Hamilton (Ed.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). New York: State University of New York Press. Van Eemeren, F. H., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods,
J., & Zarefsky, D. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A
handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
|
|