| What 
              is the focus of this module? The 
              four volcano modules are problem-based learning experiences that 
              emphasize different kinds of volcanic hazards and geologic processes.  
              
                
                   
                    | Volcano 
                      Module | Name | Emphasis |   
                    | First | A 
                      New High School in Orting | non-eruption 
                      hazards |   
                    | Second | Volcanic 
                      Unrest in Paradise | effusive 
                      types |   
                    | Third | A 
                      New Eruption in the Cascades | explosive 
                      types |   
                    | Fourth | Yellowstone | different 
                      sizes of hot spot volcanic eruptions |  
 The teacher/students 
              may choose to engage in one, all, or any combination of the four 
              volcano modules. It may be best if groups of students undertake 
              different volcano modules in order to facilitate inter-team comparing/contrasting 
              different types of volcanoes. When using modules 2, 3, and 4, be 
              aware that the uplift and seismic data are hypothetical and not 
              based on actual observations. What 
              areas of the 7-12 curriculum are addressed by the modules? 
              The modules should provide learning opportunities related to 
              earth science, geology, social studies, history and risk assessment 
              and management. What 
              is the compelling problem that students will face in each module? 
               A New High School 
              in Orting The students' company, a geological engineering firm 
              called Volcanoes-R-Us, has been asked to decide whether to build 
              a new high school in the shadow of a restless volcanic giant, Mt. 
              Rainier. Volcanic Unrest in 
              Paradise! Kilauea in Hawaii shows signs of activity. What are 
              the prospects for the nearby population? A New Eruption in 
              the Cascades? Mt. Hood is starting to act like Mt. St. Helens 
              did in 1980, but Mt. Hood is just 40 miles from the metropalitan 
              area. How might an eruption impact this populated area? The "Big One" 
              in Yellowstone National Park. America's largest volcano is stirring. 
              Are we facing an eruption as devastating as a nuclear attack? What 
              concepts and issues will students encounter as they work through 
              this module?  Geology There 
              are three volcano types. Mt. Rainier represents a "strato," 
              or composite volcano. The other two types are the "shield" 
              volcano, such as Kilauea in Hawaii, and the "cinder cone" 
              volcano such as Izalco in El Salvador. Social Studies 
              While it may be feasible to safeguard populations, social, political, 
              cultural, economic factors have to be considered. Planners have 
              to weigh the impact of restrictive measures in and about the volcano. 
              For example, should building codes restrict new developments? Such 
              measures are sure to hurt vested interests such as those of landowners 
              or communities dependent on the tourist trade. Earth Science 
              Teachers who are interested in global warming and/or the Greenhouse 
              Effect may direct students' attentions toward these areas. Volcanoes 
              are known to emit millions of tons of ash containing high concentrations 
              of sulfur dioxide. Volcanic eruptions are thought to have changed 
              the earth's climate for years after major eruptions. Examples include 
              Tambora in 1815 and Mt. Pinatubo in 1991. Risk Management 
              Information about how prepared the State of Washington is for a 
              Mt. Rainier disaster might take quite a bit of research. Inferences 
              might be made, however, from investigating how well the Mt. St. 
              Helens eruption was handled by federal, state, and local officials. 
              A similar event on Mt. Rainier, especially with the increased likelihood 
              of significant flooding, would put disaster management to the test. 
              Students should mention transportation, utilities, food, water, 
              and medical facilities.  Mt. Rainier poses 
              the following hazards:  
              Volcanic eruptions: 
                the eruption of lava flows and tephra (particulate materials such 
                as ash). Edifice failure: the 
                gravitational collapse of a portion of the volcano. Glacier outburst floods: 
                the sudden release of melt-water from glaciers and snowpack or 
                from glacier-dammed lakes on the edifice. Lahars, or debris 
                flows, and debris avalanches: gravitational movement of water-saturated 
                volcanic debris down the steep slopes of the volcano and into 
                nearby valleys.  Preparation 
              Checklist--have you thought of everything? Creating 
              a Working Problem StatementTo help students create a Working Problem Statement (WPS), you may 
              want to pose some introductory questions such as the following:
 New High School in 
              Orting This 
              scenario examines risk assessment of mud flows and glacial water 
              outbursts associated with glacier-capped volcanoes. The module describes 
              a real, ongoing situation. Students might want to directly contact 
              students at the present Orting High School or city officials. To 
              make their evaluation, students should consider statistics of mud 
              flow and water outwash frequency and size, maps showing previous 
              mud flows, the speeds of flows as indicators of warning times, geology 
              and topography of Mt. Rainier, the origins of previous mud flows, 
              the location of Orting relative to Mt. Rainier, the relation of 
              mud flows to eruptions, and comparisons with Mount St. Helens mud 
              flows. Possible recommendations 
              Build or do not build on the proposed site, build on a nearby site, 
              or evacuate the area. Materials supplied 
              a) maps/images showing Mt Rainier, outflow channels, and Orting, 
              b) tables/maps of various mud/water outflows, and c) data on risk 
              factors for common insurable disasters such as the house burning 
              down. Volcanic Unrest in 
              Paradise! This scenario emphasizes analysis of a small, effusive 
              eruption that will require only limited action. Students might want 
              to consider the nature of different kinds of volcanoes and eruptions, 
              the nature of Hawaiian eruptions and why they are different from 
              Cascade eruptions, effects of different sizes of eruptions, etc. 
              This scenario is a simulation of a small eruption typical of the 
              current cycle of activity at Kilauea that began in the early 1980s. 
              Real, up-to-date information on lava flow and seismic activity on 
              Hawaii can be found at the Hawaii 
              Volcano Newsletter. Please note that the Hawaii Volcano Observatory 
              has been in operation since the 1920s, and the scientists there 
              are very competent at predicting eruptions and issuing warnings. 
              In reality, they would not need an outside consulting firm to analyze 
              their results. Possible recommendations 
              Evacuating potentially threatened communities, closing affected 
              areas to the public, or doing nothing but taking some great pictures 
              of an eruption. Materials supplied 
              A map of the big island of Hawaii, seismic and uplift 
              maps and data, including set of seismic cross-sections extending 
              down several kilometers. A New Eruption in 
              the Cascades? In this scenario students examine the possible 
              effects of a major volcanic eruption. A Krakatoa-size event in the 
              American Cascades would be a major disaster. The initial blast could 
              literally destroy Portland and several towns along the Columbia 
              river. The river itself would probably be dammed by giant rock avalanches 
              and lava flows. Ash would probably bury the Richland area, and cover 
              huge sections of the West, stopping all ground transport, possibly 
              for weeks. There could be significant global climate effects over 
              the following years. Such an eruption is a definite--though remote--possibility 
              in the Cascades. Crater Lake in southern Oregon was formed by an 
              eruption of this scale only about 6900 years ago. Possible recommendations 
              Students could recommend evacuation of as many people as possible 
              for many miles around. The data supplied will be similar to that 
              supplied for the Hawaii scenario, but the inferred size of the eruption 
              will be hundreds of times greater. Materials supplied 
              Simulated seismic and uplift data (surface and cross-section) 
              and locator maps of the area. These materials are included in the 
              module. The "Big One" 
              in Yellowstone National Park This scenario simulates a cycle 
              of eruptive activity at Yellowstone National Park. The indications 
              implied by the simulated earthquakes and terrain uplift will be 
              ambiguous, greater than seen in recorded history (the last hundred 
              years or so), but much less than would be expected for a classic 
              Yellowstone-scale eruption. To evaluate the significance, students 
              will need to compare the volume of the current uplift (about 4 km3) 
              with the volumes of earlier Yellowstone eruptions and other volcanic 
              eruptions.  Possible recommendations 
              The scenario may take the students in several different directions. 
              A classic Yellowstone-scale eruption is so large that it would have 
              major world-wide climatic effects: the central third of the U.S. 
              would cease to exist; massive amounts of dust would circle the earth 
              for years. Humanity has no direct experience with this size of an 
              event, so extrapolation of the effects of known eruptions would 
              be necessary. Such an eruption could lead to significant floral 
              and faunal extinctions, so students' research might lead to discussion 
              of the dinosaurs' extinction. The volcanic activity of the Yellowstone 
              hotspot has been quasi-periodic over the last several million years, 
              but the range of variability is so large as to preclude definite 
              predictions. An element of uncertainty plays a large part in the 
              work and conclusions of real scientists, but it is seldom dealt 
              with in school activities. This scenario will require dealing with 
              uncertainties. Materials supplied 
              Simulated seismic and uplift data; maps of the area and a detailed 
              map of the "downstream" calderas to supplement available 
              materials on the Internet. These materials are included in the module. |